OK psych nuts, prepare to get excited. According to a recent article by the Associated Press, the American Psychological Association (or APA), which is the pre-eminent society and basically ruling body of psychology in the US, has released a report officially denouncing gay-to-straight therapies. This is huge, because there are a couple things to get from this. So, fellow psychology majors, and fellow argument/debate lovers, listen up. This is going to be fun.
First off, let's get links out of the way:
Google News
APA Summary
The Full-On No-Holds-Barred Report
There we go. Now, what does this really mean to you and I? Let me point you to two specific things that this report states:
"...the research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, regardless of sexual orientation identity..."
So, today's post is slightly selfish of me, but it raises to me an interesting possible debate.
Every year my organization holds a Drag Show, with 100% of our profits going to benefit the AIDS Resource Center of Ohio. It brings in over a thousand dollars, and it's our most popular event of the year. We fly in a notable drag queen to emcee for us, and then we have acts from numerous local talents, students, and our E-Board members, with a finale of everyone in our organization with the testicular fortitude to jump up on stage with us. Well the strangest thing happened this year... somehow I ended up on the E-Board. Crap. I have to do a number...
OK, so my first fear in this is "Oh my God I am not getting up on stage, I have huge calves that no dress can hide, I can't dance, I'm gonna look like a fool! And I'm going to do all this in a dress?!" And my second thought is "Oh my God, what number should I do? I could rock some old school Janet... ooh or what about the Yeah Yeah Yeahs? Oh, I've got it! Coin Operated Boy! Shit, I don't have a boy to BE coin operated! Oh my God, what am I doing for choreography?" (The spaz session continues, but I'll spare you the rest.)
So being me I've been talking everyone's ear off about this prospect, and met with some surprising results. First, I've been told I'd make a good drag queen... which I'm still unsure if that's a compliment or an insult. I've been told it'll be funny... sometimes that's just the message I get when I tell someone and they immediately guffaw. But I've also been told that drag is gross, and disgusting. Or creepy. Or "wrong". Um, what? I'm dressing up to put on a show to raise money for AIDS research and treatment. Lots of people do it. Birds do it, bees do it, heck even educated fleas do it (Oh my God maybe I should do THAT song!). What's wrong with drag?
So thus far I've been trying to blog at least somewhat academically, looking at topics such as religion, HIV/AIDS research, and military policy. But I'm not all long wind and research people. I like the funny.
So today, I bring you some things in my internet travels that have made me giggle, and sometimes- dare I say it- outright LOL.
First off, I'm sure many of you have seen the latest ad campaign from the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). In itself, I find it pretty hilarious. Here it is for those of us who haven't seen it, or for those who want to relive the fear:
Hilarity ensued did it not? If you're at all like me, the first thing you thought was "Oh, this is ripe for parody. If only I had a stormy backdrop and a slew of friends..." Fear not young YouTube warrior! Feast your eyes on this!
According to this article by the Associated Press, an organization of West Point alumni called "Knights Out" is gaining notice for specifically stating their goal is to target the current policy of "Don't Ask Don't Tell".
I have two perspective on this I guess. First, as an LGBT activist, I'm all for it, and it's great to hear. Anytime someone stands up for LGBT civil rights and equal treatment it's good news.
So we had our meeting Wednesday, and two members of a Christian student organization showed up. It was wonderful. They were very respectful, non-judgmental, and they invited us to a picnic along with another LGBT org, and we hear that they may be inviting other student organizations in general, so luckily this time nothing negative happened.
In preparation to avoid any negative circumstances, our E-Board decided to make this meeting "Closing the Circle". For our organization, at the beginning of the year we do "Crossing the Line" and advertise it to get as many people as possible there, and then a moderator reads statements of identity such as "I have or have had an eating disorder" or "I identify as a person of color", and people step forward as they feel it applies to them, then those who have crossed the line are given a chance to speak, typically encouraged to make their statement "I never want to hear..." and whatever they would like to fill that with. For Closing the Circle, we do not advertise so that it is only those members who have been active in our organization over the past year, and it is a silent activity, meant more for personal reflection and quiet contemplation. We did it at the meeting when the Christians came largely because it is a silent activity to discourage any outbursts or anything of that sort, and for them to see who we are... more than just gay or heathens or however we may fear being seen, but rather as everything we are as people... and a lot of us had things in common with the two who came to our meeting. For me, I was excited to see one of them step forward for "I am an ally". I'm not sure he knew what it meant in the LGBT sense, but even the fact that they participated with us was encouraging.
So, update on my campus religious organization issue.
Quick recap: My campus's Christian organizations have recently been mobilizing- confronting non-Christian individuals on campus and challenging their beliefs, closing their doors to questioning students (only allowing in affirmed Christian students), and most concerning to my position questioning LGBT students on campus and trying to "save" us.
Most recently, the leader of a group on campus asked our President when our next meeting is, and after she told him she asked if he wanted time to speak at the meeting or what we could do for him, and he said he just wanted to "show up". One of our students was told that this person and some of the students in his organization are going to come to our meeting and pray over us. Well, we notified our advisor and she went to the director of student activities. Our initial plan was apparently to allow them 3 minutes at the beginning of our meeting to lead us in a prayer and hope that they made them happy. Now I'm going to preface this by admitting that I have some pretty "atheistic" views. I put that in quotes, because I'm not necessarily anti-beliefs, or an anarchist like some would associate with that term. Simply put, I don't believe in any sort of higher power, and I don't like those views being forced on anyone who doesn't seek them out. I think it's fine to have a personal belief system, and to share that with like-minded individuals... but persecution is definitely outside my "things that are OK" zone. So I kind of went crazy. I told our advisor in our meeting that there was absolutely no way we should allow them in our doors, no less allow them to pray over us.
So... I have an update on the religious issues with my campus. After our meeting this week, some members noticed a Christian group sitting near us discussing gays in the bible, and their leader followed our President to our office and asked her when and where we meet. According to some of our members, they are planning on sitting in on our meeting and praying over us.
Seriously.
So, I have a couple ideas for how to deal with this situation. My first was to let them, then I would get together a bunch of my gay guy friends and our President would get together her bi and lesbian buddies, and we'd go to their meeting and just make out. That idea got shot down. So I guess I'm going with my plan two: I just so happen to have a good relationship with the staff of our campus newspaper, and I'm inviting them to our next meeting. If they don't show up, hey at least they're covering our organization... but if they do, that's a hell of a lead in to our Hate Crime Awareness Week where we deal with issues of bias and hate on campus. Also, it'll be a great way to get the campus involved in taking action against organizations who at this point seem like they're stalking us, and making our members not only comfortable attending meetings, but being on campus at all.
I'll let you guys know how things shape up as they go... right now it looks like things are going to get more interesting before they go boring again.

The Westboro Baptist Church, for those of you who don't know, is an extremist group famous for things such as the "God Hates Fags" slogan, protesting soldier funerals, and apparently now making death chants at President Barack Obama. At this point it's hard to take these guys seriously for me really, because the only attention they get is either comical or just highlighting how extreme and out there they are. However, Kellan Baker in this article is my new hero. He put together the "Phelps-a-thon" (Phelps is the family name of those behind the WBC) which raised money as long as the WBC protesters were at the White House, netting $500 for Gays and Lesbians Opposing Violence. FANTASTIC! And to top it all off, Fred Phelps is stilled banned from the UK. I don't often get chances to say this in life, but... neener neener neener!
So tonight is my last taste of sweet, sweet freedom... the Spring Quarter starts tomorrow. This entire week I've basically gotten to spend punishing my tailbone by sitting on my butt for extended periods of time, either in bed with a book, in my computer chair vegetating over old episodes of Buffy, Xena, and the X-Men cartoon from the 90s (PS: Did I mention I'm a crazed X-Men fanboy?), or other various prone, non-contributing-to-society positions. Tomorrow also means the resumption of my duties as Vice President of Rainbow Alliance. I'm actually kind of excited to get back to work. I get to reconnect with some fresh faces I'd only begun to meet, Spring quarter is our busiest quarter for events, and I get to take Intro to Sexuality Studies, the flagship class being tested to see if Wright State should offer a Sexuality/LGBT/Queer Studies major.
There are some drawbacks however. This year we seem to be facing more trouble than usual with our campus's Christian organizations. This is not to say that Christians are anti-gay, or that the Christian students in general are anti-gay... but there has been concerning activity with the Christian organizations on my campus lately. Last quarter, we got an e-mail from a former member of the main evangelical group on campus notifying us that members of the organization routinely pray for God to strike us down and destroy us, and the President of our Christian Student Union followed our President into our organization's office one morning and told her that God came to him and told him to save her, and to top all that off the Campus Bible Fellowship organized on Ash Wednesday to confront those on campus who weren't wearing ash and asked them why they had chosen not to accept Jesus Christ as their lord and savior.
Well, as you know by now, I'm kind of nerd for the medical/scientific stuff, and today's post will be no different. Before you click on the video below, let me explain to you what it is you're seeing. The green cell is a molecular clone of infectious HIV, with a protein encoded into its makeup that glows green under blue light. What's the significance? This is the first time scientists have actually been able to see how it is that HIV transfers itself from cell to cell. Previously it was thought that it was just a free transfer, HIV floating willy-nilly through the bloodstream and attaching on to poor unsuspecting T-Cells. In fact, it seems the main method is that the HIV infected cells create a bridge called a "virological synapse" to basically inject the host cell with the virus. Here's what it looks like:
So what does this mean for HIV/AIDS research? It means that now scientists can look at medications or vaccines that prevent the formation of these synapses in the first place, rendering the virus inert, or possibly this provides a starting point to research what happens once the virus has been introduced to the host cell via the virological synapse.
The Campus Pride Blog: Campus Q&A provides a forum to ask questions and get answers. Now you can hear perspectives, issues, news and events from LGBT & Ally student leaders at colleges and universities across the United States.

Campus Q&A is moderated by the Campus Q Team. Learn how to join and become a blogger.
Recent Comments
5 days 7 hours ago
2 weeks 43 min ago
6 weeks 5 days ago
10 weeks 1 day ago
11 weeks 22 hours ago
13 weeks 2 days ago
13 weeks 2 days ago
13 weeks 6 days ago
13 weeks 6 days ago
14 weeks 1 hour ago